|
What are the new requirements
and expectations in corporate governance today, in view of
the changing global economy, the shift of power from management
to shareholders, the complexities of global financial engineering,
the new dimensions of risk, and the pressure for greater transparency
and accountability? How can corporations meet these new requirements
and expectations?
The Panelists:
Willem Br?cker, Managing Partner, Global Markets,
PricewaterhouseCoopers, Netherlands
Khalid Al-Molem, President, Saudi Telecom, KSA
Chairing the Session:
Stewart Gilman, President, Ethics Research Center,
Washington DC
Stewart Gilman opened the session by drawing on his own experience
in the field of ethics, declaring that "the starting
point for all businesses must be values." Noting that
Enron twice voted to override its own code of conduct, he
contended that recent business failures in the US did not
result from financial crises at the corporate level but rather
from a crisis of integrity.
How important is corporate governance? According
to Khalid Al-Molem, it is "absolutely critical"
to growth. Corporate governance provides guidance, works on
behalf of investors, and invites investment. He concluded:
"If you want to privatise, if you want outside investment
in your family business, you must embrace corporate governance."
Despite the acknowledged importance of corporate
governance, at least in some quarters, the Middle East is
only beginning to address it. According to Khalid Al-Molem,
because much of the concentration of wealth in the region
is tied to governments or family-owned businesses, there has
been only limited progress toward developing corporate governance
standards. There is much work to be done, particularly in
the areas of accounting standards and independence.
Willem Br?cker addressed the global aspects
of corporate governance. He observed that the scandals in
the US have had dramatic implications in Europe and around
the world. At one time, developing countries looked to the
US and European models for standards of governance, but now
that is no longer the case.
Prompted by questions from the audience, the
panelists spoke at length about the role of the board of directors.
Khalid Al-Molem suggested the need for diversity on the board,
a sufficient mix of executive and outside directors, and executive
committees charged with addressing specific issues such as
audit committees and compensation committees. Mr. Br?cker
noted that it may now be much more difficult to attract people
to serve on the board, particularly the audit committee, because
of increased expectations and potential liability.
There was much discussion of the impact of the
recent US Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As part of the law, the CEO
must certify the financial statements of the company. Both
panelists said that this requirement makes little sense, in
light of the complexity of multinational financial statements
and the fact that they are actually created by huge teams,
not a handful of people. At a minimum, Mr. Br?cker suggested,
the entire board should "sign off" on the statements,
not just the CEO or CFO.
Some in the audience challenged the need for
additional corporate governance in the Middle East. They contended
that in many cases it would increase bureaucracy, stifle investment,
and raise costs. Khalid Al-Molem disagreed. In his experience,
the Arab world has tended to cover up issues instead of emphasising
transparency. This cannot be productive in today's world.
"Our capital markets are just developing," he stated,
"and the right rules and regulations are well worth the
cost."
Mr. Br?cker summed up the session by reflecting
on how much both business at large and his profession in particular
- accountancy - have changed in the aftermath of Enron and
in response to Sarbanes-Oxley, which is US law but studied
worldwide. "Everything is under examination, and everyone
is operating very cautiously in this new era of corporate
governance," he noted. "Accountability, transparency,
and integrity are qualities we need to embrace going forward
- but it is just as important that we do not over-regulate
and stifle business initiative."
Back
|